On Wednesday, November 10, the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the public part of the plenary session in the form of written proceedings deliberated the case upon the constitutional complaint of the Representation of ANDRITZ HYDRO GmbH regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 120-1.1 of Article 120-1 of the Tax Code of Ukraine. The Court examined the case file in the public part of the plenary session and proceeded to the in-camera part of the plenary session. Deliberation of the case will be proceeded at one of the next plenary sessions.
At the in-camera part of the plenary session, the Second Senate proceeded with deliberation of the case upon the constitutional complaint of the citizen of the Russian Federation Polina Margo regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 454.5.1 and Article 454.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine. Deliberation of the case will be proceeded at one of the next plenary sessions.
At the session of the Second Senate the issue of determining the form of constitutional proceedings in the cases upon the constitutional complaint of the citizen of Ukraine Ihor Hubko on the constitutionality of Article 361.5.1 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and upon the constitutional complaint of Liudmyla Solomakha on the constitutionality of Article 142.3 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” of June 2, 2016 No. 1402-VIII were examined. Based on the results, rulings on deliberation of cases in the form of written proceedings were adopted.
The Second Senate also adopted the Ruling on the temporary involvement of a Judge of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine from another Board of the Second Senate in the First Board of the same Senate of the Court which is incompetent due to its composition.
