On Wednesday, February 23, the First Senate deliberated the case upon the constitutional complaints of Antonina Bolotnikova regarding the constitutionality of provisions of sixth line of Article 86.15 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutor’s Office“ of October 14, 2014 No.1697-VII, Article 2 of the Law of Ukraine “On Measures for Legislative Support for the Pension System Reform“ of July 8, 2011 No. 3668-VI, Hanna Raykun regarding the constitutionality of certain provisions of Article 2 of the Law of Ukraine “On Measures for Legislative Support for the Pension System Reform“ of July 8, 2011 No. 3668-VI, the first sentence of the sixth line of Article 86.15 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutor’s Office“ of October 14, 2014 No. 1697-VII, Ihor Melnychuk regarding the constitutionality of Article 86.1 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutor’s Office“ of October 14, 2014 № 1697-VII.
Further deliberation of this case will take place at one of the next plenary sessions of the First Senate.
The Second Senate of the Court at the public part of the plenary session deliberated the following cases in the form of written proceedings:
- upon the constitutional complaint of Volodymyr Soloviov on the constitutionality of certain provisions of Section 3 of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Code of Commercial Procedure of Ukraine, the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts“ of October 3, 2017 No. 2147-VIII;
- upon the constitutional complaint of Valerii Burbak on the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 142.3 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and Status of Judges“ of June 2, 2016 No. 1402-VIII.
The Second Senate completed the study of the materials of these cases in the public part and proceeded to the in-camera part of the plenary sessions.
The Second Senate continued deliberation of the cases upon the constitutional complaint of Polina Marho, a citizen of the Russian Federation, on the constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 1 of part five, part seven of Article 454 of the Code of Civil Procedure of Ukraine and the constitutional complaint of Serhii Polishchuk on the constitutionality of the provisions of Article 16-3.4 of the Law of Ukraine “On Social and Legal Protection of Servicemen and Members of their Families“. Further deliberation of this case will take place at one of the next plenary sessions.
In the case upon the constitutional complaint of Larysa Bobyr on the constitutionality of certain provisions of Article 58.6 of the Law of Ukraine “On Banks and Banking Activity“, the Ruling of the Second Senate on the refusal to initiate constitutional proceedings was adopted.
In addition, the First Board of the Second Senate of the Court at its session considered the issue on the initiation of constitutional proceedings in the case upon the constitutional complaint of Oleksii Vaniarkha on the constitutionality of Article 3.2 of the Law of Ukraine “On Vacations“ and this Law as a whole. Based on the results of the consideration, the Resolution on the refusal to initiate constitutional proceedings (final) was adopted.
